A rather depressing posting arrived on the Patient Opinion site today.

A sentence near the end sums it up rather well: "How do I complain about the waste-of-time complaints procedure?"

The posting reminded me that the Patients Association had recently published their report NHS Complaints: who cares? who can make it better? So I went off to read it and see how typical this contributor's experience might be.

The Patients Association surveyed 1500 patients for its report, of whom fewer than 500 responded, so there is plenty of room for bias. But one finding caught my eye: of those with experience of using the NHS complaints system, 20% had found the process "pointless" and almost a further 30% had found it "totally pointless". By contrast, about 13% had found it "useful" and a further 2% "very useful".

There is quite a strong message here. Whatever it is that patients are trying to achieve through the complaints system, it evidently fails to deliver for a large proportion. But what are patients trying to achieve?

The report's findings suggest that a large proportion of patients want the system to:

• make sure everyone learns from a mistake
• ensure it doesn't happen to other people
• ensure patient's views are heard in the future
• change clinical behaviour

Interestingly, this fits exactly with our own experience at Patient Opinion. Sometimes a hospital will contact us about a critical posting on our site. "Can you remove it?" they say, "and ask the patient to make a complaint instead?" We don't remove it (of course), but we will email the patient in confidence to ask if they would like to make a complaint. And in every case to date, the patient has replied: "No, I don't want to make a complaint. I'm not trying to get anyone into trouble. I just want the problem fixed so it doesn't happen to anyone else."

Reflecting on this, a series of vague but insistent thoughts are beginning to form:

• Is the number of complaints in the NHS driven by the lack of alternative ways to feed in one's experience?
• Do hospitals drive people towards the complaints process because it is the only institutional system available?
• If other systems were available (you can see where I'm going here) which offered the possibility of being heard, helping people to learn, and making a difference to the service, would patients prefer that to the existing complaints system?
• And what would need to happen (in any system) for the majority of people to say that the process had been "useful" rather than "pointless"?

I might as well be blunt: could Patient Opinion help hospitals move towards a triple benefit: fewer complaints, greater learning from experience, and happier patients? I think we should find out!

The NHS is institutionally attuned to the big things – what’s coming down from the big beast in Whitehall or the latest missive from the Chief Executive. This stacks up into institutional agendas that focus on things like Should we be shutting the casualty unit? Do we need another Consultant surgeon? How are we going to implement the Darzi report?

And when that isn’t occupying the operational brain space then it’s all the middle range stuff – how do we reduce the number of expensive bank nurses? When is the next data return due? How do we implement the latest policy on C difficile?

But the experience of the patient is made up of the micro – Was I washed gently? Did I feel included in my care? Was the place clean? Was it too noisy to sleep at night? Such things are visible to professionals who hopefully care a lot about getting them right, but they are more or less invisible to the institution except when they result in a complaint.

Patient Opinion takes thousands of these comments about micro aspects of care and makes them more visible. But what happens then? Well often not a lot. Being focused on the strategic or the middle-range must-do’s means that busy staff all too often see patient feedback as something that just highlights irritating blemishes. At best its something to add to the already over-long To Do list. At worst something that can be easily ignored.

So how can Patient Opinion turn blemishes into blossoms? How can patient comments help set a thousand flowers blooming? Well the answer here is more than the technology. The latest guidance about how government should use Web 2.0 says that people should be prepared to respond quickly, listen and act. Which as Dan Herman points out on wikinomics blogs is great advice.

But our experience on Patient Opinion is that the only people who aren’t caught in the cross fire of conflicting incentives here are the patients. So the trick is using their energy, enthusiasm, and ideas to drive micro change hundreds of times across the NHS. One early example is allowing people to comment on how the trust has responded – see what one less than pleased punter thinks of the hospital's response to their posting.

No one thought that thousands of people would step up to the mark and help create Wikipedia. Or that there were millions of people just waiting for an on-line auction site. The trick is to find ways to galvanise people’s real enthusiasm for the NHS into a process that involves staff and causes thousands or service improvements to blossom. A good analogy perhaps as creating this culture is probably more like gardening than meeting policy targets or implementing Lord Darzi’s report. Slow, gentle persistent work to get the conditions right. And resisting the temptation to pull everything up by the roots once a day to see how they are doing.

Working in the NHS its often hard to see that some things are getting better. And then along comes a posting that shows you just how much things have changed. For most of the 25 years that I have worked as a GP miscarriage has been a condition that was commonly trivialised by doctors and nurses as "Oh, its just a miscarriage". But this  moving story shows how attitudes - at least in some units - have changed for the better. Which also says volumes about the work of the Miscarriage Association too.

Paul

Chief Executive, Patient Opinion (and part-time GP!)